Under both normative and descriptive decision theory, tontines and tontine-related retirement income products have proven their superiority to classical annuity products. In the present paper, we show that benefits of a properly designed tontine dominate the benefits of an equally priced annuity as the pool size tends to infinity, leading individuals to prefer tontines with a sufficiently large pool size to annuities under utility preferences which are increasing and continuous in consumption. Such preferences include but are not limited to cumulative prospect theory and generalized expected utility preferences, which we use as examples to illustrate our theoretical findings. Our results present an interesting puzzle which we call “tontine puzzle”, raising the question why the development of the tontine market is still in its infancy in practice.
The Tontine Puzzle
A research done by An Chen and Manuel Rach
Apr 3, 2023
An Chen,
Manuel Rach
Like it?
Share it with your friends and family.
More like this
View All
Longevity Risk: Rethinking Retirement Planning
Exploring how individuals perceive life expectancy, the strategies they use to manage longevity risk, and why annuity demand remains puzzlingly low.
Oct 7, 2025
Benefit Volatility-Targeting Strategies in Lifetime Pension Pools
A dynamic asset allocation approach that stabilizes pension payouts by jointly managing investment and mortality risks.
Oct 7, 2025
Optimizing Longevity Risk Management with Dynamic Hedging in GSA Funds
This study demonstrates how dynamic hedging using longevity forwards can significantly stabilize payouts in group self-annuity funds while maintaining strong long-term returns.
Oct 6, 2025